Our Justice Dept. is currently seeking to even the gap between criminal sentences on Crack and Powdered Cocaine.
As we all know, minority neighborhoods are more affected by the sales and negative attributes of crack cocaine as opposed to powdered cocaine. Its no secret, crack is cheaper, however the criminal consequence is much greater than that of powdered cocaine.
To even the disparity, our Justice Dept is seeking to decrease the sentencing on offenses involving crack cocaine to equal those of powdered cocaine. Some see this as a measure to as well decrease the number of minority arrests and imprisonment.
Unfortunately I don’t believe this is an effective measure. As a first hand witness to drug activity in minority neighborhoods, I believe this would only open our neighborhoods to an increased amount of drug activity while adversely inviting more participants.
Having spent some time studying the habits of drug dealers, it’s apparent that due to the current disparity, a lesser amount of drugs are dealt by one single person. It’s my fear that decreasing the sentencing will invite these individuals to take greater risks in their operations thus leading to a backfire of the plan.
If nothing else, the sentences of powdered cocaine offenses should be increased to mirror those of crack cocaine offenses. Of course this now affects the majority neighborhoods (per demographic studies that show powder cocaine is more relative to these areas) therefore posing a threat to powdered cocaine dealers.
Ultimately the goal should be to deter and eventually eliminate drug operations in all areas however it seems as though the politicians of our country are not concerned with the holistic view of this issue but with the favoritism that will come in siding more positively with one area.
What say you?
Tags:
Share
Facebook
-
▶ Reply to This